Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Libby Brooks's avatar

Really enjoyed this - I'm working on the last couple of scenes of Act 2:2 and struggling as you predict. My heroine Len has had a dramatic falling out with her co-investigator Joyce, who challenged her over her world view that everyone deserves a second chance (can't think who gave me that idea...) and now there's a scene where Len has to give Stella, the mother of the child murder victim, a letter from his killer. It's a massive crossing of the line for Len, so unprofessional and counter to her usual ethic. And I'm struggling with how Stella receives it - outrage? guilt? (she does have something small to be guilty about) curiosity? (for the plot she needs to be curious enough to meet Lachlan).

I really like what you say in the longer post about it being a time to dig deep (and find answers from Len's past) - and also that it's fine to go quickly, doesn't have to be lengthy exposition, think that's where I'm getting tangled.

I have two scenes - the one with Stella, then Len meets Scott MacDougal, one of Lachlan's old classmates, who tells her things about his behaviour as a teen which completely reverse everything she's thought about him up to this point, and send her rushing to the prison to stop Stella meeting Lachlan, which she fails to do. (I know you mentioned once the idea of Len getting a final piece of the puzzle from her mean grandmother, like a reverse visit to the goddess, but I'm just not sure how to make that work).

I find it helpful to really pinpoint what I want to cover in each scene so I think I need to go back and do that again for these two, for the sake of clarity.

Thanks so reading, it always helps me to think out loud even if it's tl;dr for everyone else! And thanks Alex for keeping me going

Expand full comment
Miselle's avatar

"Reading too much about publishing"--GUILTY as charged!

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?